: Leica M240 . If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Quality over quantity. Help us by suggesting a value. I have a Fuji X100f and stripped down the OVF/EVF data and shoot in manual with manual focus only to give it a M2 feel. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. By The M10 is also very slightly lighter than the M240. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. Hi everyone. Leica m240 sony a7sii . Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. That said, M10 GAS is real. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! Aluminium body makes is nice and light. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. If you want video and live view, get the 240. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. I cant. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. The menu is cut and dry. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. Great article as always! They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. On the other hand, if you do describe your GAS in terms of Leicas, and suggest a Monochrom is the kind of thing you forget in a cupboard, well. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. Seems I do once again. Functionalism be damned. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Youve often been a voice of reason in my ear on this website, John. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Everything is very tactile. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. Why torture yourself? The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. Can you compare side by side, please? The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. Manage Settings The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. . I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Very interesting. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! Got a spare lottery ticket? I missed his musings in AP. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. This is an inspiring and generous website. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. Upload or insert images from URL. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Ive got a 262 and I really like the fact that its completely stripped back to just the basics. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. You and Roger Hicks. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. The price is$5195/4050. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. Paste as plain text instead, The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. Image quality will be essentially the same. Learn how your comment data is processed. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. I did eventually get the 1.25 viewfinder magnifier to go with it. The sensor is not the same, by the way. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. Ultra-niche appeal. "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. No more out of focus shots. It depends on your needs. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. I am primarily a Nikon digital and film shooter, and my quest for minimalism and the fact that I already own a Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera were the major reasons to sell the digital Leica 262. Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. Well worth seeking out. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Ive had it for a month now. Great write up! The M9 and CCD sensor. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. I prefer live view for wider lenses to an external viewfinder. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. You can post now and register later. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science.

What Counties In Va Do Not Require Emissions, Shooting In Bridgewater, Nj Today, How To Open Gas Tank On Subaru Outback 2021, Articles L

leica m240 vs m262 image quality